We are grateful to the reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their suggestions. KCSD is a complex object to study and an important aspect of our contribution is to estimate its properties with good asymptotic result under mild conditions. We introduce an unbiased estimate and a statistical test using fast algorithms which are easily applicable to many datasets. Our results cannot be found elsewhere and further work can build on our mathematical treatment to assess statistical properties of kernel methods for stationary data. Most importantly, this contribution aims at bringing results from kernel methods to communities that are in important need for general time series analysis techniques with good statistical properties. Measures describing the dependency structure of the data without model assumptions, such as the linear cross-spectrum, became standard in applications such as Neurophysiology.

Reasoning based on causality, instead of association has been considered as a key ingredient towards real machine intelligence. However, it is a challenging task to infer causal relationship/structure among variables. In recent years, an Independent Mechanism (IM) principle was proposed, stating that the mechanism generating the cause and the one mapping the cause to the effect are independent. As the conjecture, it is argued that in the causal direction, the conditional distributions instantiated at different value of the conditioning variable have less variation than the anti-causal direction. Existing state-of-the-arts simply compare the variance of the RKHS mean embedding norms of these conditional distributions. In this paper, we prove that this norm-based approach sacrifices important information of the original conditional distributions. We propose a Kernel Intrinsic Invariance Measure (KIIM) to capture higher order statistics corresponding to the shapes of the density functions. We show our algorithm can be reduced to an eigen-decomposition task on a kernel matrix measuring intrinsic deviance/invariance. Causal directions can then be inferred by comparing the KIIM scores of two hypothetic directions. Experiments on synthetic and real data are conducted to show the advantages of our methods over existing solutions.

When applying unsupervised learning techniques like ICA or temporal decorrelation, a key question is whether the discovered projections are reliable. In other words: can we give error bars or can we assess the quality of our separation? We use resampling methods to tackle these questions and show experimentally that our proposed variance estimations are strongly correlated to the separation error. We demonstrate that this reliability estimation can be used to choose the appropriate ICA-model, to enhance significantly the separation performance, and, most important, to mark the components that have a actual physical meaning.

When applying unsupervised learning techniques like ICA or temporal decorrelation, a key question is whether the discovered projections are reliable. In other words: can we give error bars or can we assess the quality of our separation? We use resampling methods to tackle these questions and show experimentally that our proposed variance estimations are strongly correlated to the separation error. We demonstrate that this reliability estimation can be used to choose the appropriate ICA-model, to enhance significantly the separation performance, and, most important, to mark the components that have a actual physical meaning.

When applying unsupervised learning techniques like ICA or temporal decorrelation,a key question is whether the discovered projections arereliable. In other words: can we give error bars or can we assess the quality of our separation? We use resampling methods totackle these questions and show experimentally that our proposed variance estimations are strongly correlated to the separation error.We demonstrate that this reliability estimation can be used to choose the appropriate ICA-model, to enhance significantly theseparation performance, and, most important, to mark the components that have a actual physical meaning.